What is Project Quantum (QBIT) crypto coin? The truth behind the gaming token with zero trading volume

Dec, 4 2025

QBIT Trading Volume Reality Checker

See how $100 would convert to QBIT tokens and understand the risks of trading tokens with zero liquidity

Project Quantum (QBIT) sounds like the next big thing in gaming and crypto. A AAA game built on Unreal Engine 5? Tokens that reward players just for playing? It’s the kind of pitch that gets people excited. But here’s the reality: as of December 2025, Project Quantum has no live game, zero trading volume, and a token price so low it’s almost meaningless. If you’re wondering whether QBIT is worth your time or money, the answer isn’t what the YouTube videos promise.

What is QBIT, really?

QBIT is a BEP-20 token built on the Binance Smart Chain. That means it works like other tokens on that network - you can send it, store it in wallets like MetaMask or Trust Wallet, and trade it on decentralized exchanges like PancakeSwap. But unlike tokens tied to real products, QBIT doesn’t have a functioning game behind it. The project claims it’s building a sci-fi MMOFPS called Project Quantum, where players hunt monsters, mine resources, and trade loot that has real-world value. Sounds cool? Maybe. But there’s no public beta, no demo, no player counts, and no screenshots of gameplay. Just a website, a GitHub repo with no commits in years, and a handful of social media posts.

How does the QBIT token economy work?

According to founder Fraser Gordon, every time QBIT is traded, 10% of the transaction is taxed. That tax gets split three ways: 3.5% goes to BNB, 3.5% gets reinvested into the game economy (to boost item values and rewards), and 3% is distributed to QBIT holders. Sounds fair, right? It’s designed to create a self-sustaining loop: more trading = more value for holders. But here’s the catch: if no one is trading, the system doesn’t work. And as of now, CoinMarketCap shows 24-hour trading volume at $0. Zero. That’s not a glitch. That’s a signal.

Why is the price so weird?

You’ll see QBIT priced at $0.0000001786 on CoinMarketCap. That’s 0.00001786 cents. Other sites list it differently - Bitscreener says $0.0000017, Holder.io says 0.00017 cents. These aren’t typos. They’re signs of extreme illiquidity. When a token has no buyers or sellers, prices become arbitrary. They’re often set by bots, small wallets dumping, or bots scraping fake data. The price doesn’t reflect market demand - it reflects noise.

Is Project Quantum listed on any exchanges?

No. Not on Binance. Not on Coinbase. Not on Kraken. Not on KuCoin. CoinMarketCap lists it, but that’s because anyone can submit a token for listing there - no verification needed. Holder.io, a site that tracks actual exchange listings, says QBIT is “not traded anywhere.” Binance’s own guide says “Project Quantum (QBIT) Not listed.” So how do you buy it? Only through decentralized exchanges like PancakeSwap, and even then, you need to set slippage tolerance to 15% or higher. That’s not normal. That’s a red flag. It means even tiny trades can crash the price.

Chaotic trading floor with active blockchain games on one side and empty, decaying QBIT symbols on the other.

Who’s behind it?

Fraser Gordon, based in Scotland, is the founder of Quantum Works. He’s done interviews on YouTube, talking about how Project Quantum will “take AAA gaming into the 21st century.” He mentions partnerships with Unreal Engine developers and plans to license their blockchain plugin to other studios. But there’s no evidence of those partnerships. No press releases. No technical whitepapers. No team bios. The GitHub repo (github.com/electro-magic/projectquantum) hasn’t been updated since 2022. The Twitter account (@projectquantum_) has about 1,200 followers - mostly bots or crypto enthusiasts hoping for the next big moonshot.

How does it compare to other blockchain games?

Compare QBIT to Gala Games (GALA), The Sandbox (SAND), or Axie Infinity (AXS). Those projects have active players, real economies, and millions in daily trading volume. Gala Games has over 10 million registered users. Axie Infinity peaked with over 2.5 million daily players. Project Quantum? No player counts. No leaderboards. No in-game purchases. It’s not even close. The entire blockchain gaming market was worth $4.65 billion in 2022. Project Quantum has captured less than $0.0001% of that.

Are the price predictions real?

Sites like CoinCodex and Bitscreener predict QBIT will hit $0.00007180 by 2025 and $0.0006804 by 2050. That’s a 40,000x increase from today’s price. These predictions are based on algorithms that analyze Bitcoin halving cycles and historical volatility - not real-world adoption. They’re math tricks, not forecasts. If a token has zero trading volume and no product, no algorithm can magically make it valuable. These predictions exist to give false hope to people who already bought in.

A YouTube creator points at a fake price graph while ghostly investors weep over empty wallets and outdated GitHub commits.

Should you buy QBIT?

If you’re looking to invest in crypto, QBIT is not a good choice. It’s not a scam in the classic sense - there’s no evidence of outright theft or fake team members. But it’s a speculative gamble with no upside. You’re betting on a game that doesn’t exist, with a token that no one trades, backed by a team that hasn’t shipped anything in over two years. The only people making money from QBIT are the ones who sold early, or the content creators who make YouTube videos promoting it. The disclaimer on those videos says it all: “Created for entertainment purposes ONLY - NOT financial advice.”

What’s the real story here?

Project Quantum is a classic case of vaporware wrapped in blockchain buzzwords. It uses the excitement around AAA games and crypto rewards to attract attention. But without a working product, it’s just a website, a token, and a dream. The crypto space is full of these projects - flashy pitches, zero execution. Most fade away quietly. A few get bought out by bigger players. A rare few become something real. Project Quantum doesn’t look like any of those.

What should you do instead?

If you’re interested in blockchain gaming, look at projects with real players and real trading volume. Try out The Sandbox or Gala Games. Play their games. See how the economies work. Follow their roadmaps. See if they ship updates. That’s how you find real value - not by chasing a token with $0 volume and a 2022 GitHub commit.

Is Project Quantum dead?

It’s not officially dead. The website still loads. The social media accounts still post. The token still trades - at $0 volume. But in crypto, if a project hasn’t shipped a product in over three years, it’s functionally dead. No community growth. No developer activity. No exchange listings. No player adoption. Those aren’t delays. Those are signs of abandonment.

17 Comments

  • Image placeholder

    Joe West

    December 6, 2025 AT 02:41

    QBIT is the textbook example of a vaporware token wrapped in AAA game hype. Zero volume? No demo? GitHub dead since 2022? If this were a startup in Silicon Valley, they’d be out of funding by now. In crypto? They get YouTube videos and a Reddit thread like this one. Sad, but predictable.

  • Image placeholder

    Mairead Stiùbhart

    December 7, 2025 AT 10:23

    Oh wow, so the game’s not real but the YouTube ads are? Groundbreaking. 🙃
    Next up: ‘Project Unicorn’ - a flying horse NFT that runs on solar-powered dreams. I’ll take 10,000.

  • Image placeholder

    Cristal Consulting

    December 7, 2025 AT 15:51

    Same energy as those ‘Bitcoin will hit $1M’ posts from 2017. Just louder. And with more Unreal Engine screenshots.

  • Image placeholder

    Billye Nipper

    December 7, 2025 AT 22:40

    Guys. I know it’s tempting. I’ve been there. I bought into a ‘revolutionary’ fitness app token that turned out to be a Figma mockup with a smart contract.

    But here’s the truth: if you can’t play the game, you’re not investing in a game. You’re investing in a fantasy.

    And fantasies don’t pay bills.

    Walk away. Seriously. Find something real. The Sandbox has playable levels. Gala has community events. QBIT has… a website with a spinning globe. 😔

  • Image placeholder

    Shane Budge

    December 9, 2025 AT 19:22

    Price listed as $0.0000001786? That’s not a price. That’s a decimal error.

  • Image placeholder

    Chris Mitchell

    December 11, 2025 AT 05:09

    It’s not about the token. It’s about the pattern. No product. No team. No traction. Just promises. This isn’t crypto. It’s a carnival ride with no safety rails.

  • Image placeholder

    Nicole Parker

    December 11, 2025 AT 12:44

    I get why people fall for this. We all want to believe in the next big thing. We want to think ‘what if this time it’s different?’

    But crypto’s not a lottery. It’s a system. And systems need users, activity, and execution.

    QBIT has none of that. It’s a ghost town with a shiny sign.

    I used to think ‘maybe they’re just slow.’ Now I think: maybe they never started.

    It’s okay to admit that. It’s okay to walk away. You’re not losing out - you’re avoiding a trap.

  • Image placeholder

    sonia sifflet

    December 13, 2025 AT 08:22

    You people are so naive. This is clearly a Western government operation to destabilize decentralized finance. The fact that no one is trading it? That’s the proof. They’re suppressing volume to prevent mass adoption. The real game is coming - but only if you buy now and hold through the suppression phase. Don’t listen to the FUD. This is the next Bitcoin. I’ve seen the whitepaper. It’s encrypted in the blockchain.

  • Image placeholder

    Barb Pooley

    December 13, 2025 AT 13:23

    Wait… so if the token has zero volume, how are they even getting the price? Are the devs just typing numbers into CoinMarketCap? Like… ‘okay, today’s price is 0.0000001786… tomorrow it’ll be 0.0000001787… because we believe in magic?’

    Also, who’s the guy in the YouTube videos? Is he even real? Or is it a deepfake with a Scottish accent?

  • Image placeholder

    Krista Hewes

    December 14, 2025 AT 23:48

    im so sad for the people who bought this 😭 i know how it feels to think you found something special and then realize it was just… a dream. please be kind to each other out there. crypto hurts a lot of people. dont be mean to the ones who got scammed. they just believed too hard.

  • Image placeholder

    jonathan dunlow

    December 16, 2025 AT 08:46

    Let me break this down like you’re five. Imagine you’re building a Ferrari. You’ve got a logo. You’ve got a website. You’ve got a press release saying it’ll go 0-60 in 2 seconds. You’ve got a token that gives you ‘ownership’ of the car. But you’ve never built the engine. Never put wheels on. Never test-driven it. And now you’re asking people to pay you $10,000 for the ‘right’ to own this car that doesn’t exist.

    That’s QBIT.

    And the kicker? The people selling this are the same ones who sold you the ‘Ferrari’ in 2017. They just changed the color of the logo.

    Don’t be the sucker who pays for the brochure.

  • Image placeholder

    Annette LeRoux

    December 17, 2025 AT 03:06

    QBIT is like a romance novel where the characters never meet. The plot is beautiful. The cover is stunning. The author writes long letters about how deeply they feel. But you never actually get to read the story.

    And yet… people still buy the book. Just to say they own it.

    It’s not about the game. It’s about the story we tell ourselves.

    Maybe we all just want to believe in magic.

    But magic doesn’t pay your rent. Real games do. 😊

  • Image placeholder

    michael cuevas

    December 17, 2025 AT 09:42

    Why are we even talking about this? It’s not a project. It’s a meme. A very expensive, very sad meme. Someone made a website, slapped a token on it, and now they’re just waiting for the next idiot to buy in.

    It’s not even a scam. It’s just… laziness.

    Move on.

  • Image placeholder

    rita linda

    December 17, 2025 AT 20:09

    It is an incontrovertible fact that the absence of trading volume constitutes a systemic failure of market liquidity, which, in turn, evidences a profound disconnection between speculative aspiration and material utility. The token’s nominal valuation, derived from algorithmic noise rather than demand-side equilibrium, represents a metaphysical abstraction divorced from economic reality. Furthermore, the lack of verifiable team credentials, coupled with the absence of substantive developer activity, constitutes a prima facie case of institutional malfeasance. One must conclude, therefore, that QBIT is not merely unviable - it is ontologically deficient.

  • Image placeholder

    Jonathan Sundqvist

    December 18, 2025 AT 03:01

    Look, I’m not saying it’s a scam. But if your ‘AAA game’ has more Twitter bots than players, you’re not building the future. You’re just spamming the past.

  • Image placeholder

    Tara Marshall

    December 18, 2025 AT 03:56

    Don't buy it. Don't trade it. Don't even click the link. It's dead.

  • Image placeholder

    Mariam Almatrook

    December 20, 2025 AT 01:19

    Let me be the first to say it: this is not a failure of technology. It is a triumph of human gullibility. The fact that a token with zero utility, zero activity, and zero credibility can still command a listing on CoinMarketCap - and attract investors - is not a flaw in crypto. It is its most profound, most disturbing feature. We have turned speculation into a religion. And QBIT is its most devout, most hollow icon. The real innovation here isn’t blockchain. It’s our ability to believe in nothing, and call it something.

Write a comment